253
253
Mar 5, 2013
03/13
by
CNNW
tv
eye 253
favorite 0
quote 0
should state laws in this particular case regulate are marijuana trump federal law? >> absolutely. we need to change federal law. i agree with asa. we need to legalize marijuana nationally but in the meantime, the best thing the federal government can do is step pack, make it clear it's a low-enforcement policy. >> a good debate, a debate that's going to continue. thanks to both of you for coming in. >> thank you. >> you it. >>> while we're waiting to see when the cardinals at the vatican will pick a new pope, the vatican is waiting as well. why the cardinals can't yet start the conclave. rgentina, change engineering in dubai, aluminum production in south africa, and the aerospace industry in the u.s.? at t. rowe price, we understand the connections of a complex, global economy. it's just one reason over 75% of our mutual funds beat their 10-year lipper average. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. request a prospectus or summary prospectus with investment information, risks, fees and expenses to read and consider carefully before investing. with investment information, risks, fe
should state laws in this particular case regulate are marijuana trump federal law? >> absolutely. we need to change federal law. i agree with asa. we need to legalize marijuana nationally but in the meantime, the best thing the federal government can do is step pack, make it clear it's a low-enforcement policy. >> a good debate, a debate that's going to continue. thanks to both of you for coming in. >> thank you. >> you it. >>> while we're waiting to see when...
217
217
Mar 8, 2013
03/13
by
CNNW
tv
eye 217
favorite 0
quote 0
joining us now, two guests, v victoria tunsing and a harvard law professor. why is new york a better place to try him than guantanamo bay? >> our constitution sets out a procedure for trying criminals. this is the procedure. he dets trial by jury, he gets a lawyer. he is a combatant. he's also a criminal. he's a terrorist. he's an unlawful combatant. the executive has the power to choose whether to treat him as a combatant and put him in front of a military tribunal or simply detain him until the war is over, whatever that would mean in the context of war against terrorism. but he's a criminal who conspired to till americans. they have the option of giving him our full due process rights, putting him on trial, let the public visibly and transparently see how we treat people who attack america. let him either be convicted or acquitted. that's the way our justice system operates. we should be proud of it. >> victoria, you disagree? >> absolutely. this is a political decision. to try him in a federal courtroom in new york is disconsistent with this administratio
joining us now, two guests, v victoria tunsing and a harvard law professor. why is new york a better place to try him than guantanamo bay? >> our constitution sets out a procedure for trying criminals. this is the procedure. he dets trial by jury, he gets a lawyer. he is a combatant. he's also a criminal. he's a terrorist. he's an unlawful combatant. the executive has the power to choose whether to treat him as a combatant and put him in front of a military tribunal or simply detain him...
191
191
Mar 6, 2013
03/13
by
CNNW
tv
eye 191
favorite 0
quote 0
we have, within the united states, the ability to use our law enforcement capacity. and as a result, the use of drones is, from my perspective, something that is entirely, entirely hypothetical. >> holder talked about drone policy during an appearance before the senate judiciary committee. he got a little heated. >> certainly did. there's another reason that a lot of people are worried about drones flying over the united states. the fbi is investigating a claim that a drone was spotted near one of america's biggest airports. brian todd is following this story for us. brian, what do we know? >> wolf and indicate, this happened at midday over jfk international airport in new york, where the security situation in the air and on the ground is very sensitive. what's got officials concerned is not only the sighting of this possible drone, but just how close it might have come to a passenger yet. on a approach to new york's jfk airport, an airlines captain spotted something very close to his jet. here's what he said to the control tower. >> what did you see? >> we saw a dro
we have, within the united states, the ability to use our law enforcement capacity. and as a result, the use of drones is, from my perspective, something that is entirely, entirely hypothetical. >> holder talked about drone policy during an appearance before the senate judiciary committee. he got a little heated. >> certainly did. there's another reason that a lot of people are worried about drones flying over the united states. the fbi is investigating a claim that a drone was...
198
198
Mar 4, 2013
03/13
by
CNNW
tv
eye 198
favorite 0
quote 0
he could have really helped his country -- >> he's not doing anything illegal, that's the law. that's the income, that's what you pay. >> absolutely -- >> he doesn't have a salary. if he had a salary, he'd pay 39%. >> if he were a waiter, he'd be pay a higher tax rate than the 14% he's paying as a multimillionaire. perfectly legal but it's an outrage. >> a perfect example of why we are in so much trouble. that is a statement of fiscal policy. you can't say this enough, that washington's consumed with who should pay how much tax, how much more tax, and who should get how much less benefit. meanwhile, we have an economic crisis. we're now entering year six. and it is not met by increasing taxes and cutting spending in this year. you want to get to prosperity first. and the idea that you're going to say, what we're going to organize the country around is resenting what mitt romney had. >> it's not what he has, it's what he refuses to pay. well, the loophole he takes advantage of legally. that's an outrage. fundamental fundamentally, mitt could have done that as well. he created mi
he could have really helped his country -- >> he's not doing anything illegal, that's the law. that's the income, that's what you pay. >> absolutely -- >> he doesn't have a salary. if he had a salary, he'd pay 39%. >> if he were a waiter, he'd be pay a higher tax rate than the 14% he's paying as a multimillionaire. perfectly legal but it's an outrage. >> a perfect example of why we are in so much trouble. that is a statement of fiscal policy. you can't say this...
191
191
Mar 2, 2013
03/13
by
CNNW
tv
eye 191
favorite 0
quote 0
the cuts once considered too painful to consider are now the law of the land. president obama and congressional republicans could not reach a compromise to avoid the $85 billion in automatic cuts. they will not happen all at once, but instead they will come over time. they are pointing fingers at each other over their failure to reach a deal. >> probably would be a lot better ways to reduce that spending than by the formula approach of the sequester. but we don't intend to spend a penny less as promised to the american people. >> these cuts are not smart, they will hurt our economy and cost us jobs. and congress can turn them off at any time as soon as both sides are willing to compromise. >> the cuts will hit different agencies in different ways. and there has been some confusion over how they will take effect. one good example is this, the faa held a conference to back away earlier this week, that 160 air traffic controller towers around the country would have to close on april one. others listening in were told the initial announcements of the cuts had not b
the cuts once considered too painful to consider are now the law of the land. president obama and congressional republicans could not reach a compromise to avoid the $85 billion in automatic cuts. they will not happen all at once, but instead they will come over time. they are pointing fingers at each other over their failure to reach a deal. >> probably would be a lot better ways to reduce that spending than by the formula approach of the sequester. but we don't intend to spend a penny...
522
522
Mar 9, 2013
03/13
by
CNNW
tv
eye 522
favorite 0
quote 0
not enforce the laws for three months, until restaurants adjust. they're looking at lawsuits possibly filed by beverage companies and restaurants to try to stop them on the ban on super sized drinks. he estimates the changes will cost his business tens of thousands of dollars, lots of headaches. >> lots of headaches, digital signs, billboards, websites, information training, computers, everything. >> now, another big company that is holding off making changes right now was starbucks. it says there are a few gray areas of sorting through. they are using the city's three-month evaluation period to see the type of changes they need to make to be in compliance. so wolf, the ventes are safe for now. >> appreciate it very much, mary. >>> and new talking and defiance by north korea after the new tests. and now the united nations is pushing back. we'll speak about all of this and more to the u.s. ambassador to the u.n., susan rice. go faster! no! stop...stop... (mom) i raised my son to be careful... hi, sweetie. hi, mom. (mom) but just to be safe... i got
not enforce the laws for three months, until restaurants adjust. they're looking at lawsuits possibly filed by beverage companies and restaurants to try to stop them on the ban on super sized drinks. he estimates the changes will cost his business tens of thousands of dollars, lots of headaches. >> lots of headaches, digital signs, billboards, websites, information training, computers, everything. >> now, another big company that is holding off making changes right now was...
150
150
Mar 7, 2013
03/13
by
CNNW
tv
eye 150
favorite 0
quote 0
>> we will when the law says we have to. right now we're sort of in limbo and we're allowed by the city law to hold off until about june. >> reporter: the city says it will not enforce violations for about three months as restaurants adjust. lavigne is waiting to see the result of a lawsuit filed by restaurants, beverage companies, and others to try and stop the city from its ban on supersized drinks.estimates all the change will cost his businesses tens of thousands of dollars and a lot of headaches. >> a lot of aggravations, menu changes, sign changes, digital boards, facebook, websites, information, training, computers, everything. >> now, another big company that's holding off making changes right now is starbucks. it says there are a few gray areas it's sorting through and it's using the city's three-month evaluation period to see what changes it needs to make to be in compliance. so, kate, the ventis are safe for now. >> should i get a venti skim latte and ask them to put sugar in it, they will put sugar in it, or i ha
>> we will when the law says we have to. right now we're sort of in limbo and we're allowed by the city law to hold off until about june. >> reporter: the city says it will not enforce violations for about three months as restaurants adjust. lavigne is waiting to see the result of a lawsuit filed by restaurants, beverage companies, and others to try and stop the city from its ban on supersized drinks.estimates all the change will cost his businesses tens of thousands of dollars and...